Ken Rosenbrock's 2026 Season Stats

Comprehensive performance analysis and trends

Average Gross

65.0

Average Net

42.0

Average Points

4.5

Total Points

18.0

Wager Statistics
Total Money Wagered

$0

Skins: $0
Games: $0
Total Money Won

$0

Skins: $0
Games: $0

$0

Net Earnings

(Won - Wagered)

0

Skins Entries

($5 each)

0

Games Entries

($2 each)
Opponent Performance vs Handicap

2.8

Average Opponent vs Handicap

(negative = opponent played better)

2

Weeks Opponent Played Better

2

Weeks Opponent Played Worse

0

Weeks Opponent Matched Handicap

Handicap Information
Starting Handicap

23.20

Current Handicap

23.20

Season Trend

No change

Match Play Record

1

Wins

3

Losses

0

Ties

Win Percentage

25.0%

(4 total matches)

Handicap Progression
Points Performance
Score Trends
Performance Analysis
Hole-by-Hole Performance
Per-Hole Consistency (Lower is better)
Best & Worst Gross Scores by Year
Year Best Gross Worst Gross Average Gross Total Rounds
2025 57 (Week 12) 71 (Week 5) 65.1 16
2026 63 (Week 5) 69 (Week 3) 65.0 4
Yearly Hole-by-Hole Performance Heat Map
Yearly Hole-by-Hole Performance vs Par

Best year · Worst year (per hole, when 2+ years of data)

Year Hole 1 Hole 2 Hole 3 Hole 4 Hole 5 Hole 6 Hole 7 Hole 8 Hole 9 Hole 10 Hole 11 Hole 12 Hole 13 Hole 14 Hole 15 Hole 16 Hole 17 Hole 18
2025
+3.6
(7.6/4)
+2.7
(6.7/4)
+2.4
(5.4/3)
+4.0
(9.0/5)
+3.7
(7.7/4)
+3.3
(7.3/4)
+3.9
(8.9/5)
+2.3
(5.3/3)
+3.6
(7.6/4)
+3.4
(8.4/5)
+4.4
(8.4/4)
+4.4
(8.4/4)
+1.9
(4.9/3)
+3.4
(7.4/4)
+2.4
(7.4/5)
+3.6
(7.6/4)
+2.7
(5.7/3)
+2.6
(6.6/4)
2026
+6.0
(10.0/4) ↑
+2.0
(6.0/4) ↓
+3.0
(6.0/3) ↑
+3.0
(8.0/5) ↓
+2.0
(6.0/4) ↓
+2.0
(6.0/4) ↓
+5.0
(10.0/5) ↑
+2.0
(5.0/3) ↓
+2.0
(6.0/4) ↓
+1.0
(6.0/5) ↓
+4.7
(8.7/4) ↑
+4.7
(8.7/4) ↑
+2.0
(5.0/3) ↑
+3.0
(7.0/4) ↓
+3.3
(8.3/5) ↑
+4.0
(8.0/4) ↑
+3.7
(6.7/3) ↑
+3.3
(7.3/4) ↑
Scoring Breakdown
Eagles

0 (0%)

Birdies

0 (0%)

Pars

2 (7%)

Bogeys

3 (10%)

Double Bogeys

9 (30%)

Worse

16 (53%)

Best & Worst Holes
Best Hole

#10 (1.0+ vs par)

Worst Hole

#1 (6.0+ vs par)

Week-to-Week Consistency
How much your scores vary from round to round
Net Score Std Dev

2.45

Lower = more consistent week-to-week
Net Score Range

6

Difference between best and worst rounds
Consistency

75.0%

(3 rounds within 2 strokes of average)
Best Performances
Best Gross

63 (Week 5)

Best Net

40 (Week 5)

Most Points

8.5 (Week 6)

Challenging Weeks
Worst Gross

69 (Week 3)

Worst Net

46 (Week 3)

Fewest Points

2.5 (Week 5)

Theoretical Best Round
Best score on each hole across all rounds
Theoretical Best Gross

115

Actual best 18-hole round: 126 (best front 9 + best back 9) 11.0 strokes better than actual best
Hole-by-Hole Breakdown:
Hole 1:
10
(Week 6)
Hole 2:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 3:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 4:
8
(Week 6)
Hole 5:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 6:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 7:
10
(Week 6)
Hole 8:
5
(Week 6)
Hole 9:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 10:
5
(Week 3)
Hole 11:
8
(Week 3)
Hole 12:
7
(Week 7)
Hole 13:
4
(Week 3)
Hole 14:
4
(Week 5)
Hole 15:
6
(Week 7)
Hole 16:
6
(Week 5)
Hole 17:
5
(Week 5)
Hole 18:
7
(Week 3)
Theoretical Worst Round
Worst score on each hole across all rounds
Theoretical Worst Gross

141

Actual worst 18-hole round: 132 (worst front 9 + worst back 9) 9.0 strokes worse than actual worst
Hole-by-Hole Breakdown:
Hole 1:
10
(Week 6)
Hole 2:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 3:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 4:
8
(Week 6)
Hole 5:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 6:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 7:
10
(Week 6)
Hole 8:
5
(Week 6)
Hole 9:
6
(Week 6)
Hole 10:
7
(Week 5)
Hole 11:
10
(Week 5)
Hole 12:
10
(Week 3)
Hole 13:
6
(Week 7)
Hole 14:
9
(Week 7)
Hole 15:
10
(Week 5)
Hole 16:
10
(Week 3)
Hole 17:
8
(Week 3)
Hole 18:
8
(Week 7)
Weekly Performance Summary
Week Opponent Gross Net Points Handicap Result Opponent vs Handicap
3 Brandon Smith 69 46 4.0 23.20 Loss 9.0
5 Jerry Fechner 63 40 2.5 23.20 Loss -3.0
6 Kensey Bermingham 63 40 8.5 23.20 Win 6.0
7 Erich Kirchner 65 42 3.0 23.20 Loss -1.0
Head-to-Head Results
Week Opponent Net Score Difference Result
3 Brandon Smith 1 Loss
5 Jerry Fechner 7 Loss
6 Kensey Bermingham -2 Win
7 Erich Kirchner 7 Loss
Weeks with Subs
Week Sub Golfer No Sub Points
1 No Sub Yes 2.5
2 Mark Thomas No 6.0
4 No Sub Yes 4.5